June 20, 2013

Browns Content to Be Competitive and Developing

As the Browns’ list of cuts was finally released and then as they failed to claim anyone, Mike Holmgren and Tom Heckert’s view of the current Browns is becoming apparent.  The team is far from a finished product and instead of grasping at players who appeared to be minor upgrades the Browns seem content in seeing what they have with the unknown young talents.

Obviously I am talking most notably about the wide receiver position.  As outside observers, it seemed that this was one of the most dire needs the team has had all off-season.  As guys like Vincent Jackson were dangled and as guys like T.J. Houshmandzadeh were cut and became available, the Browns sat idle.  In fairness to the Browns, Housh was unlikely to sign with a team not looking seriously at the playoffs this season, and the asking price was so high on Jackson that he still hasn’t been traded to date.  Still, it speaks volume either about the potential of Massoquai, Robiskie and Cribbs, or the Browns’ desire to see that talent before extending offers to any other players.

This helps put the quarterback position into perspective.  The Browns loaded up, relatively speaking, when they signed what they hoped to be two competent options.  They obviously didn’t see either Delhomme or Wallace as the long-term solution for QB, but they found a couple of guys who they think will allow them to accurately see what they have everywhere else.  This includes the offensive line, the young running backs and the young wide receivers.  As QB prospect Nate Davis was let go by the 49ers yesterday in favor of Troy Smith it didn’t take long to assume that the Browns probably wouldn’t be putting in a claim on him.  That speaks more to the stage of development that the Browns seemingly find themselves than it does about Nate Davis as a prospect.

The linebackers seem similar.  The Browns brought in some nice complementary pieces in Scott Fujita and Chris Gocong to add competence and professionalism to the linebacking corps.  They will find out what they have with the young guys on the roster and probably look to add playmakers in forthcoming drafts at the position.  This may give many Browns fans pause as the “prospects” are the likes of Kaluka Maiava and the punchline up to this point in David Veikune.

No sense in signing a receiver in his 30′s staring into the twilight of his career.  Instead of wasting cash on minor upgrades in free agency and off the scrap heap the Browns are thinking bigger and long-term.  Despite the injury to Montario Hardesty, the Browns will look to build mostly through the draft.  They hope that Joe Haden is an impact corner and will look to add more impact players in the years to come.  They invest in certain hand-picked placeholders like Fujita, Sheldon Brown, Wallace and Delhomme.  It isn’t sexy like what the Redskins have done over the past decade, but did you really want the Redskins anyway?

It sounds so simple on paper, but it should help us think practically about the Browns right now.  As the Browns seem idle on the waiver wire for the most part, we shouldn’t be surprised.  The Browns are not grasping at every little straw to make this team just marginally better with players that won’t fit into their long-term strategy.  They appear to have a type and kind of player they want and will be content with being just competitive as they develop younger players and see what they have on the roster.  Just how competitive remains to be seen.

  • B-bo

    And now begins anew a test of Browns fans’ collective patience, a test we have failed repeatedly over the last decade. Can we as a group allow a new plan to develop without the lighting of torches and the rending of garments if it doesn’t fix everything right away? Will we let a big-name QB prospect sit and learn (as he clearly needs to do) without calling for the head of the guys ahead of him on the depth chart after the first 3 game losing streak of the year? Can a FO and coaching staff be allowed to take root and get established, or will there be effigies of Mangini, Holmgren, and Heckert burning in the Muni lot after a single 5-11 season together? I agree with the direction the team is choosing to go, and I believe it can be successful, given time. I just don’t know if I have faith in the greater fan base to give that time.

  • http://clevelandthing.blogspot.com Ammo

    Great column.

    As for the WR’s…it makes sense, especially with Bernie’s comments about receivers running wide open last year but the QB’s either not seeing them or misfiring their throws. Given how the coaches have raved about Brian Robiskie, it makes sense as to why we’re willing to move forward with what we have there.

    The lack of speed at linebacker is concerning, despite what Mangini says about 3-4 LB’s playing bigger and slower. We know this isn’t the case by looking at other 3-4 teams. We desperately need to replace Elam (perhaps we should look at recent Seahawk cut Jordan Babineaux, Holmgren should be familiar) and our DL could stand to be a little more youthful…but that’s what next year’s draft and FA period is for.

    Bottom line: IT IS A PROCESS. Just keep drafting well in the high rounds.

    p.s. speaking of drafting well in high rounds…if Robiskie breaks out like the coaches are saying and Massaquoi and Mack continue to develop, the 2009 draft class will be a huge success despite Veikune likely being a big miss.

  • Chris

    Everyone saw how great Houshmanzilla was when he was lined up across from Ochocinco, but then he flopped in Seattle as a #1.

    If you line him up with Boldin and Mason, he’ll probably be a great #2 option, but if match him up with Robiskie and Massaquoi, I think it would duplicate what they experimented with in Seattle. I think that had more to do with the Browns declining to talk to him than the money factor did.

  • http://shakesthesnowglobe.blogspot.com EZ

    Agree with the points about the WR corps and the LBs, but the thinness at corner really does worry me. I’m glad we’re not relying on McDonald anymore, but now (including CB/S Mike Adams) we’re one injury away from actually not having enough corners to defend in a Dime package, which is scary.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Craig Lyndall

    EZ, I agree. I am also concerned about defensive line. I love the emergence of Rubin, and I love the idea of Rogers and Robaire out there too. But the corps feels a bit undermanned in terms of depth if/when injuries occur. Robaire Smith isn’t getting any younger and Rogers got hurt last year. 27 year-old Schaefering had some nice looking plays in pre-season, I guess, but I would love to have another prospect or two on the DL past Ahtyba Rubin.

  • Fred Ledoux

    I think Kaluka Maiava played fairly well last year. The Browns are wise to keep this kid, beacuse he has a tenacity for the football and got the IQ to go along with it.

  • Hamfist

    Man, I keep typ9ing the same thing over and over. you guys are probably sick of it, too. LOL

    Here it is: we are set up with 1-gap types of LBs, and we play a 2-gap 3-4. 1-gappers need to be bigger and can sacrifice some speed. 2-gappers need to be faster/quicker, and can sacrifice some size.

    1-gap LB attack the line of scrimmage and almost become a defacto 4-3, or 5-2. Hence the need for, essentially, smallish D-linemen who stand up and attack the line at the gaps where the 3 down men are attacking the opposite shoulder of an OL.

    2-gap LBs sit back and read/react to the flow of the ball, hence the need for more mobility.

    Now,look at our LBs. For which scheme are they more physically suited?

  • http://shakesthesnowglobe.blogspot.com EZ

    Browns sign CB Derrick Roberson who apparently played 6 games for Tampa last year and is 5’10″.

  • Harv 21

    @ 1/B-Bo: disagree with the premise that a failure of patience by fans has anything to do with the organization’s dismal recent history. Other Randy Lerner stepping in to temporarily save Savage’s job a few years ago after fan e-mails I can’t remember the fans influencing anything these guys have done. Had nothing to do with the bad choices in the draft, bad selection of coaches, decisions to load undeserving guys with power. Think of the decisions that have crippled the Browns – Clark as first GM, letting Butch Davis control personnel, letting Mangini pick his GM/”boss,” horrible drfat selections. Nothing to do with fan impatience.

  • Pingback: The End of the David Veikune Era in Cleveland | WaitingForNextYear