May 22, 2013

NFL Fan Conduct Policies Stretch Outside of Cleveland

Fan conduct within Cleveland Browns Stadium had been a hot topic of discussion heading into the preseason.  With the Browns looking to become more apt to enforce rules that have been in place for several seasons and delaying the opening of one of the city’s most popular tailgating spots, an article in the most recent edition of the Sports Business Journal presents an ideal that appears to be envisioned outside of Cuyahoga County.

“I think what we’re driving to is a cultural norm within our stadiums,” said Jamey Rootes, President of the Houston Texans.  ”You’re talking about the 1 percent jerk factor. In any place you go, 1 percent of the population is going to be a jerk, so we as a league and as individual teams have to make it clear that this type of behavior is not [okay].”

Early last month, Browns team president Mike Holmgren went public with his desire to “overhaul” the experience at Cleveland Browns Stadium to make it more friendly, to “create a fun and safe experience.”  Soon after this initiative – deemed Home-Field Advantage – kicked off, it created a bit of controversy amongst fans.  Some applauded the team’s efforts while other opposed, claiming that the NFL is a product in and of itself and that games, specifically those in Browns Stadium, can be policed by those in attendance.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced a similar initiative several seasons ago, with much of his focus on secondary ticket sales, ensuring that the majority of fans inside a given stadium were those of the home team.  Thinking here is that fewer fans of the opposing team would mean less chance for an altercation.  Alas, the onus would then be placed on the original owner of the tickets, placing them in full responsibility of what occurred by a third party that may have been using said tickets.

Since Goodell’s initiative, many teams have implemented the infamous text lines where fans can report unfavorable behavior.  With the team providing sub-par results, more season-ticket holders have increasingly placed their tickets on the open market, resulting in a lot of secondary sales.  The Browns appear to be set to act more aggressively this season with regard to these aspects as season-ticket holders will reportedly have their license revoked for infractions deemed worthy of such punishment.

And as with any hot topic, teams are finding themselves in the midst of a balancing act.

I think it’s a fine line, too,” said Mark Donovan, Executive VP of the Kansas City Chiefs.  ”You don’t want to take the passion out of the fan base. You want to give them that opportunity to set the parameters and have ways of policing the parameters.”

For those that align themselves more with Donovan than the stance of Holmgren or Rootes, note that all sides appear to be in agreement that the “fan experience” extends way beyond behavior.  While many team front offices are looking into ways to ensure fans do not act in an uncontrollable manner, they are also looking into taking the steps necessary to ensure that fans feel that they are getting a return on their investment.  Ranging from more easily accessible concession stands and restroom facilities to the taste of food and beverages given the cost at hand.

“It’s something we as a league have to keep an eye on and make sure that we talk about getting people in the stadium versus watching on [at home],” said Rootes. “Even when they’re watching on HD, we want them to see that and say: ‘I’ve got to get there. That looks like the place to be.’”

As indicated by Mike Holmgren’s thoughts last month, the teams are also well aware that winning may in fact be the most important factor.  Fan arrests have been up year-over-year since 2007 when the Browns won 10 games under Romeo Crennel.

“I think it goes hand-in-hand when the team’s doing well, you want to watch the game and be part of it,” Holmgren said. “The fans are very, very important in the team’s success. Instead of acting up, you’re cheering for the team.”

New season, new game plan [Sports Business Journal - Subscription]

  • Joseph

    How do those text lines work? The sign says to text the word “Browns” to a 5 digit number. I don’t understand how they will know what the problem is.

  • Browns44140

    I’ve wondered the same thing that Joseph pointed out. I have season tickets and have seen the promos mentioning to text fan behavior. How do they know where it’s happening?

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Scott

    To my knowledge, it opens a line of communication. From there, they’ll reply back and you provide your section and reportable offense.

  • Black 27

    I have always found this to be an interesting issue. It seems like at some point in the mid-90′s, franchises everywhere started changing the focus of whom they really wanted in the stands.

    I noticed it when attempting to heckle opposing players in my own characteristically obscene fashion. Before there would be no comment from anyone (other than to laugh at whatever I said.) But then, suddenly, when I refer to Mike Hargrove as nothing worse than a “dumbass,” Mr. and Mrs. Suburban Milquetoast with their Meaghann and Tylerr and Madisyn in tow would get all righteously upset. And call the ushers. Who would appear in teams reminiscent of Soviet Spetznas tactics.

    This is everywhere now. Not just Cleveland. Every sports venue is pretty much overrun by corporate tickets and a bunch of lame-ass families. And you know what? That’s cool with me. My buddies and I will stay home in front of the big screen, drink what we want, crack each other up, and not worry about what a bunch of uptight Meaghann-herders think about our juvenile antics.

  • Jack

    Any chance we can get a full instructional video on how to tattle on people via text later this week?

    *Black 27 for President (or VP of Stadium Operations or something…)

  • Chris

    @4 the thing is, while I have no problem with someone drinking a little or swearing some, nothing gives you any more right to be there than a family of suburbanites. Further, that family has just as much right to enjoy themselves without their kids learning fun new words as you do. if you would rather stay at home than watch your language, that is also your right.

  • JJ

    I totally agree with 4 and 6, must be the gownup/imature fella in me!

  • BuckeyeDawg

    Maybe we need to implement a rating system for live entertainment events like we do for movies. That way the people who don’t have any common sense about what they are getting themselves into can be forwarned.

    For example:
    Rated G: Disney on Ice, Dora the Explorer Live
    Rated PG: Golf, Tennis, Baseball
    Rated PG-13: Football, Hockey, Basketball, NASCAR
    Rated R: MMA

    If we do this, the little 8 year old Timmy’s parents can’t get all shocked and indignant when they bring him to a Browns game and the colorful language being hurled at Ben Roethlisberger lands in his innocent, virgin ears (yeah, right).

    I would consider football PG-13. If you don’t think that your parenting can overcome your child’s hearing of the “F-bomb” at a Browns game, then don’t bring him. We shouldn’t be forced to change our gameday experience because of a few idiots who can’t control themselves and a few fans who come to a Browns game expecting a Disney on Ice type atmosphere. Throw the idiots out, give fair warning to the naive fans.

  • JJ

    @8 I think you may have hit it dead on!

  • Chris

    It could also be argued, that since you’ve owned the same team jacket for years, and the suburbanites have to buy new ones for their 2 boys every year as they grow, that that suburban family actually has MORE right to be there than you. (I assure you that while *I* don’t feel this way at all, the Browns front office probably does.)

  • Cindy

    I’m not for santitizing the NFL stadium experience but this isn’t just about making a football game kid friendly . As a woman, I’d like to go to a game without catcalls to remove my shirt. Look at what happens to women at football games in NY.

  • SxDx

    Football and alcohol bring out the worst in people. I applaud the Browns for trying to clean things up a bit. People pay anywhere from 30-100 dollars to watch a crappy team, they shouldnt have to deal with a bunch of drunk obnoxious idiots who spill beer on people, pick fights with opposing fans and, as Cindy mentioned, scream at women “show your t*ts”. Do these dipsh*ts really think it helps the team by screaming f*** you at opposing players? By all means cheer loudly for your team but dont act like a jackass in doing so. When I go to a game I want to watch it and enjoy it, not listen to some drunk redneck who thinks its still 1987, and that he can say/do whatever he wants because he spent half of his paycheck on a ticket. Yes the Browns do have to appeal more to families and corporate types because thats what keeps them in business these days. It it wasnt for families and corporate types the stadium would be 40 percent empty like it was in the Muni days. Municipal Stadium is dead, the Dawg Pound is dead, its a new era folks. If that bothers you then stay home and watch the games on TV, at least you CAN watch the games on TV these days. It wasnt that long ago when a locally televised home game happened about once a year.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Denny

    “Football and alcohol bring out the worst in people.”

    Ah, so THAT’s what happened with all those tattooed bros in South Bend this past weekend.