May 19, 2013

Browns Lose an Especially Ugly One to Falcons

Let’s put this 20-10 loss in perspective a little bit.  All-world left tackle Joe Thomas had an awful game at the hands of John Abraham.  Thomas gave up a sack.  He gave up the injury to Seneca Wallace’s right ankle that knocked him out of the game.  Lastly, he got housed by Abraham on Jake Delhomme’s final interception.  The loss isn’t Joe Thomas’ fault alone, but you just can’t expect to win a game like this when your very best, most consistent players fail so miserably.  This was like a bizarro injury-riddled Browns game.

Mohamed Massaquoi had a decent game.  That statement in and of itself should leave you shaking your head.  In a game where Seneca Wallace gets hurt and a still hobbled Jake Delhomme takes over, Massaquoi “explodes” for 5 catches and over 50 yards receiving.  As I said, it was a bizarro game.

If the QB injuries threatening to let us see Colt McCoy weren’t scary enough, Peyton Hillis’ injuries were worse during this game than I thought coming into it.  He played admirably catching a touchdown pass and coming in the game hurt multiple times, but ultimately the one-man Browns offense just couldn’t contribute the way he has been so far this season.

And speaking of QBs, let me say that the performance wasn’t good enough today.  The Browns were doing fine until Wallace got injured.  I know that Browns fans everywhere (and Bill Simmons on twitter) want to throw the last shovel of dirt on Jake Delhomme’s career.  Let me say that they might not be wrong to do so.  Delhomme might seriously not have a single thing left in the tank.  Still, I wouldn’t be honest, if I didn’t say that Jake Delhomme hasn’t been healthy since the first half of the first game of the season.  I don’t want to be in the business of defending Jake Delhomme, because more and more it appears that dog won’t hunt.  The two interceptions today don’t help his cause even if Joe Thomas collapsed into him on the last one.  Delhomme still must not throw that ball into a defender or his own linemen.  Can’t do it.

ALL THAT BEING SAID, A little perspective though.  We all saw him run this team better in the pre-season.  We know that he hasn’t been healthy.  We know that he wasn’t healthy enough to play today until he got thrust into action against the will of the team.  Even after a day like today, there is no QB controversy.  Let’s all just hope that either Delhomme or preferably Wallace is healthy enough to go next week so Colt McCoy isn’t indoctrinated to the NFL by the Pittsburgh Steelers.

That is the story of the game here.  There are no excuses in the NFL.  The Browns are a deeper better team than they were a year ago, but a week with seven penalties from the Browns should be an oddity.  A week of injuries like this lets us know just how much better they need to get, top to bottom, before they are a legitimate threat to win every week in the NFL.

One more thing. Be afraid of next week Browns.  If you have a time machine, just jump ahead and skip next week altogether.  If I had that flashing device from the Men in Black movies I would ready it for this time next week.  The Browns are banged up from Wallace and Hillis to Delhomme.  They are playing a Pittsburgh team that is 3-1 despite missing their starting QB due to suspension.  The Browns defense has played pretty well this year, but they could be facing a serious time of possession deficit next week.

As always, we will have more this week about this game whether you like it or not!

  • 6thcity

    There was a lot of positive development in the first half. Tough play from a scrappy team. I disagree with Seneca having a bad run during the game. However, The fact is that we aren’t built, or healthy enough, to lose our 2nd string QB to injury and sending in the already injured supposed starter. That’s just too much to handle.

    Most importantly- don’t forget we scored two touchdowns in a row. Literally (Mo Mass certainly had two feet in). That’s such a good 2-plays-in-a-row that it’s technically impossible.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Scott

    I would have tweeted from the stadium if not for Verizon’s oh-so awesome network being stretched into shambles. By no means was this a game that this team deserved to win, but is one of those games that “winners” win – if that makes sense.

    Even worse is that Delhomme was given a four-point head start (seven if you count the spread!) and still botched it away. Thomas was awful. Harrison was brutal.

    If anything, I’m mad because I missed all of the camera shots of Mangini’s mug from home.

  • Chris

    Thanks for this. I was coming here wondering what would be said about the QB situation, and I like your perspective.

    Give Delholmme a healthy game or to before we start calling for blood.

    And really, there will never be a QB controversy: Everyone from the fans to Holgremm know neither Wallace nor Delholmme are the quarterback for the Browns.

  • cuzon steve

    not that i even care anymore, but…the brown ran the ball 20 times, threw 39 times. something wrong there. even if atlanta is stuffing it, you have to stay commited to the run. poor coaching, again.

  • whyeie

    This one was hard to watch

  • humboldt

    @Scott – I was thinking the exact same thing.

    I missed the first half but watched the second half in a bar, on a TV alongside the Colts game. From what I saw, Indy played lousy football, but they just plain gutted out a win, and the game never seemed to be out of their grasp. Conversely, whenever the Mangini-era Browns have a lead it just feels so tenuous. Watching those two games, I felt I was witnessing the difference between a winner and a team trying not to lose. At this point, the problem just feels systemic to me, and the whole culture just needs to change.

    At the risk of incurring the wrath of readers, I would just ask: how much does an absentee owner have to do with the culture of losing we see out there?

  • Chris

    Hillis was banged up, Harrison has been ineffective, and Massoquai was working. Poor coaching would have been to go with a gameplan that wasn’t working when we had one that was.

    We were winning until Wallace got hurt, after all.

  • JM

    Yup blame the coaching. Like always. So the next coach can come in here and lose too.

  • boogeyman

    Chris just about every team is winning at some point I don’t see much of anything positive, again, to be taken from a Browns game. When do they ever have a game plan? They might as well not even play the second halves of these games the way the offense disappears.

    I hate to be a basher but enough is enough. This team is still to inconsistent that you can’t possibly say they are improving. Today the dumb penalties showed up again and so did the turnovers. The one thing the offense did well previously, run the ball, was stuffed and we all know they can’t pass. The defense hung in there but had the ball run down their throats and Brown was beaten for another long TD. I guess one positive was Eric Wright wasn’t torched in the game.

  • Bryan

    Despite the Ugly effort. Delholmme is still our leader and team captain. When Wallace went down he did just that stepped in and tried to perform despite not being 100%. So for that I credit him.

    As for the running game I’m really from two perspectives. I love Peyton Hillis as much as anybody else but continuing to test his Thigh like that was risky in my opinion. I would have rather seen him rest for one half of football instead of risking further injury for the year (Luckily this did not happen)

    As for Jerome Harrison I have to ask this question What can we get out of him that we could not possibly get out of James Davis (Or Montario Hardesty when not injured.) I would really like Davis to be given some opportunities so we can analyze whether or not it’s worth retaining Harrison Next year. Thoughts?

  • jj

    I don’t blame the coaching, I don’t blame the penalties, I blame Jake Delhome! I know he was thrown in the mix and wasn’t expecting to play, but very bad decision making on his part.

    And boogeyman– seriously, give it up bro, or sis, whatever you are. Haters always hating. Players only love you when their playing.

  • http://www.redright88.com Titus Pullo

    Randy Lerner has zero to do with how the Browns perform on Sundays, unless he’s calling the plays or putting on a helmet and pads.

    We had an extremely hands-on owner before with Art Modell and how much winning did the team do under him?

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Craig Lyndall

    We have discussed this a couple times already this season. Randy Lerner is never going to be a great owner, but he has officially has skirted any responsibility for what happens on Sundays by hiring Mike Holmgren.

    Complain about Lerner some more if you want, but he is no longer a problem worth worrying about if you do find him to be a problem.

  • boogeyman

    jj maybe they should have put McCoy in huh?

    speaking of Holmgren where is he and what’s the over/under on how long before he either makes a change or shows some outward sign of displeasure with his team?

  • humboldt

    @Titus & Craig – I know the Lerner issue is one of the major non-starters in Cleveland sports. I’m not linking the owner to this loss, or to any event on the field today or any other day. I’m more thinking in terms of what Scott mentioned, which is that the organization just lacks a “winner’s edge”, as qualitative as that may be.

    Obviously the reasons for this are multifaceted and probably unquantifiable, I just can’t help but sense that a more present owner could put a winner’s imprimatur on his organization, just like Steve Jobs does with Apple or Bill Gates does w/ Microsoft (or Bill Polian does w/ the Colts).

    I understand that it really doesn’t matter what the answer to this question is since what we have is what we have. I guess it helps to think about more “meta” issues within the organization since the product we see on Sundays is so beset by problems

  • Ike

    Randy Lerner’s name has about as much to do with this conversation as my name does. As weird as this sounds, he’s just not relevant.

    I’m not going to pile on Delhomme, but he clearly didn’t play too well. I think the biggest concern is the straight up disappearance of Jerome Harrison. Regardless of QB, with the way Hillis plays, the Browns absolutely need a viable 2nd RB and they simply don’t have that right now. That was apparent today. I’ve been a Harrison proponent for years, but it’s clear the guy isn’t with it this year.

  • Chris

    @13:

    Agreed. Hillis gives us hopes of being competitive, but we need a one, two punch… right now we just have a one.

    I really thought we were going to see a wildcat drive in the third quarter, after Delholmme proved he wasn’t fully back from the injury. I have no idea why we stopped after two plays. I would really love to see us open the playbook.

    If we don’t have a LOT more wildcat options than we’ve seen so far in the regular season, something is wrong with our offense at a very high level. Cribbs is easily our most explosive player, and should be our #2 weapon, IMO.

  • Gren

    Harrison ineffective is almost a compliment to the way he’s played this season. He’s either lost it completely, or doesn’t care in the least bit. He fell over Steinbach’s foot… why ? Because he dragged his leg while running on a play, who does that ?

  • bobby

    I am kinda shocked by the anger at this loss. Did anyone look at this game preseason and say, “we should win this game.” Atlanta just has more talent, and when the browns are as banged up as they are with Wallace, Delholmme, Hillis, and dont forget Hardesty. I mean, I just dont think you should really expect a team with the slim talent we have to win games like this.

    I am actually pleased with this game. We showed even when banged up we are still a competitive team. Its going to be a slow building curve with this team, and short of the fumbled snap, its a 1 possession game. How much of a difference would those 4 points have been in the last drive? We wouldnt of HAD to pass allowing Atlanta to just attack a hobbling QB. Yes, playcalling leaves a lot to be desired on the offensive side of the ball, and I feel like Holmgren needs to step in here and fix something. BUT Ryan stepped up his D calling and I applaud that. The long TD pass is on Elam for not covering his part of the field. We all knew Elam is a weak link.

  • http://www.redright88.com Titus Pullo

    These past few weeks have certainly showed why the Browns wanted Montario Hardesty and why they didn’t rush into giving Jerome Harrison a contract extension off of three games last season.

  • bobby

    Harrison has by far been the biggest disappointment this season.

  • Harv 21

    1) Wasn’t RB our one position of depth? If Harrison is that messed up mentally right now, play Davis. Can’t get worse. Hillis looks like he’s already breaking down, as everyone predicted.

    2)Hate to say it but Delhomme is starting to look cooked. Bad mental gaffes unrelated to his ankle. A red zone throw into double coverage right to a db should have been intercepted, and wasn’t close to the receiver. The diving pick 6 should have been a basic lob over a blitzer to your guy standing all alone. That wasn’t his ankle. If Wallace can’t go, they just have to sign a qb rather than risk feeding Colt to the wolves next week.

    3)Talking to a guy in Steelers gear this afternoon. I said, “you guys had a bye-week this week?” He said, “we have one next week, too.” Cannot wait until I don’t agree with him. This could be real ugly.

  • The Other Tim

    I’ve never seen a player want to be field less than Jake Delhomme today.

  • saggy

    Randy Lerner needs to be more involved – just like Al Davis. Or James Dolan. Or Daniel Snyder. Or Donald Sterling. Shoot – even Jerry Jones hasn’t won anything in 15 years, and the only reason he won was because of the trio of HOF’ers – NOT because of his “hands on” ownership.

    Gimme a break. the owner’s responsibility is to hire the proper management team. The owner puts up the cash; the managers manage the team. Lerner puts up the cash and has recently made a great move in hiring Holmgren. It’s now up to the walrus. Randy Lerner’s involvment – or lack thereof – means absolutely nothing in this situation.

  • saggy

    and I can see them starting Cribbs before McCoy takes a snap this year.

  • humboldt

    @saggy – people always throw out those examples. But look no further than our backyard, and consider the difference b/t the Gordon Gund and Dan Gilbert eras. Gilbert has clearly put a winner’s stamp on the Cavalier organization – it’s palpable, from the top down. Again, I’m past the point of blaming Lerner; at this stage, I’m just trying to comprehend the life lessons from his lack of leadership, if only so I can extrapolate them to things that really matter in the world!

  • Joseph

    bobby,

    I agree. I am hopeful as always that we’ll compete and possibly win but Atlanta is a better team and really I’m not shocked we lost. I expected this to be a long season before it began and I’m happy in the fact we’re at least staying in games instead of being blown out.

    The QB situation looks like it could get ugly however..

  • Marc

    Jake looked as if he could not move in the pocket. All things considered Jake played OK. The real problem was the offensive line, particularly Joe Thomas. Joe Thomas was frequently beaten today, and the offensive line as a whole played awful. There was constant pressure on the QBs and they failed to open any holes for the RBs. On one interception Jake got punched in the head as he through and the other one was tipped. I think this one is on the OL.

  • jj

    Oh… yeah…. I am so glad…. we are competing… Give me a break, forget preseason, forget what you “thought”! I AM NOT HAPPY! Forget competing!!!! I want to win! It’s all about winning in this league, and since ’99 we have barely done that!!! Sorry. I am old and bitter, but I DON’T CARE ABOUT COMPETING!!! I want a winner, and we have no clue how to do that, no matter who is in the front office, or the qb or the coach! Give me a winner already, SHEESH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Whatever………..

  • Mark

    @humbolt – I see your point but nothing about Lerner makes me think he is anywhere near capable of being a Gordon Gund or Dan Gilbert. Given that, I’m fine with him being away and installing Holmgren in his place. I guess the question is can Holmgren get it done? What does he think of this mess?

  • humboldt

    @ Mark – that’s well put. Tony Grossi had an interesting point in his Hey Tony feature about Holmgren (and Heckert) being inaccessible (he rationalized it as wanting to avoid taking the spotlight from Mangini). I hadn’t really considered their absence, but it’s true that we haven’t had a real public presence from Lerner, which goes without saying, or his proxy Holmgren. Obviously if we were winning it would be immaterial, but I agree with you that it’d be nice to hear something from the top about the 1-4 start.

  • jimkanicki

    @19-harv: i think hillis’ situation is more serious than reported. from pluto:

    It’s not widely reported, but Hillis missed four games in 2006 with “calcification of the bone in the right thigh” when he was at Arkansas.

    myositis ossificans is a serious injury. it’s what ended cam neely’s career. ulf gave him a cheap leg check to his thigh. a year later cam neely had what was described as a brick of bone in thigh muscle. the stuff does not go away cannot be surgically removed.

    gang, heads up: dont fall in love with hillis. he might not be with us long term.

  • Joseph

    @jj

    I’m not happy we’re losing either; it sucks and it gets old. At the same time though I’d rather we stay in ball games and at least keep it somewhat competitive instead of blowout losses. Once Wallace got hurt you knew Jake wouldn’t be wonderful since he’s obviously not 100% right now.. hard to really expect much out of him today.

    I think today though as Marc said our OL got the brunt.. especially Thomas. It happens to the best of them sometimes.

  • Big Nick Z

    Bobby, I agree

    Wallace has been playing great the past few weeks and I’m proud of him. You can’t say enough about how tough Hillis has played, he left it all out on the field today. Everyone’s acting like Jake threw two picks… Bierman batted one of his passes then made a FANTASTIC play on the ball to grab it and take it for 6, then John Abraham punched him in the side of the head as he was throwing, forcing Jake to throw the ball off the back of one of the linemen’s heads.

    When Jake came in, the receivers got a case of the DROPSIES and Josh barely missed on one of his deep balls. All said, I’m not holding this one against Jake.

    Like Bobby said, Atlanta just won this one. I’m proud of the way the Browns played today.

  • Mark

    @jimkanicki – The way Hillis runs and the lack of a #2 RB, I always figured he isn’t long for the NFL life. The league sees RBs as a dime a dozen.

  • jimkanicki

    i would LOVE to make a run at alex smith. unfortunately good alex came out in the 4th qtr… but it’s still a ‘buy-low’ opportunity.

  • jimkanicki

    one more thing, re: joe thomas. he’s regressed this year.. that sometimes happens.

    what is inexcusable is that the right side of the line hasn’t found a replacement for ryan tucker who left four years ago. i know against cincy we saw some effective runs to the right, but i bet a review of tape would show vickers (who generally lines up on right side) pancaking someone. we onto our third retread RT (shaeffer, stclair, pashos).. time to realize that if he were that great, he’s not going to be a bargain. ie, you’ll need to overpay to get OL talent via free agency. (see: steinbach, eric.) if we haven’t looked into the price for logan mankins (all-pro guard for pats, currently holding out), we ought to. he wouldn’t be a ‘patch’.. he’d be anchor for 5+ years.

    everyone looks at massaquoi production and assumes he sucks. we look at qb’s throwing picks and assume they suck. very few ‘talent’ position players can overcome poor OL play. and on the other hand, a great OL is the difference between blair thomas (drafted #2 overall in 1990, jets) and emmitt smith (drafted #17 in 1990).

  • BuckeyeDawg

    All things considered, it was a gutsy performance against a superior team. The Browns simply don’t have the talent to go toe to toe with a top 10 team and come away with a win very ofter. They have to play perfectly to win games like this, and the penalties and turnovers caught up with them late.

    I continue to be encouraged by the defense. 13 points allowed to that offense is another solid effort. Considering we had half of a QB and an injured starting RB, and were only down 3 in the fourth quarter to a team like Atlanta is a positive compared to where were were a year ago.

    We all want to win…but it’s not going to happen overnight. The defense is good enough to keep us in games, but our offense isn’t good enough to win them consistently. All we can do is hope that Holmgren can fix that this off season, because there are no silver bullets on the horizon for this season.

  • Chris

    @38:

    I’ve been beating the “progress” drum all season. I agree, with a lot of your points, but I’m very frustrated by all the stupid penalties today, so I find out a lot harder to be happy with this one. It feels like a big regression.

  • Hamfist

    @JJ

    Well, you better get another team. We’retoo undertalented to be competitive consistenly. We have a ncie core of some good players, but our dropoff in talent from our #! to our #2 is too drastic.

    So, you have a choice to make. Root for the Browns as they develop, or pick another team. simple, really.

  • Rocky

    Can anyone please expain to me why the Browns elected to wear their dark uniforms on a day that was projected to be 80 degrees while allowing the opponent to wear white? My understanding is the home team can choose its uniform. You could see the Browns players sweating profusely even in the first half and anyone with a third grade knowledge of physics knows that dark colors capture heat and white reflects it. If it was an oversight, it was just flat out stupid. As the saying goes, “Life is tough, but it’s tougher if you’re stupid.”

  • jj

    @40 I’ve been a Browns fan for 34 years! I will always be a Browns fan!! I root for them week in and week out! They have been developing since ’99 bro, just getting harder and harder to just “wait as they develop”!!!

    @41 No doubt!