May 21, 2013

Antonetti: If Healthy, Sizemore Will Be in Center

Last night in Downtown Cleveland’s Playhouse Square, the Indians held a Town Hall Meeting, where fans were invited to ask questions of new General Manager Chris Antonetti and Field Boss Manny Acta about the upcoming season, which by the way, starts in just over two months.

The hottest topic on the table was the health of Grady Sizemore, who missed most of last season with a knee injury that required the very tricky Micro-fracture surgery.

During Sizemore’s absence, Michael Brantley, a key piece to the future of this club, took over the Centerfield job and played well. While the Indians would like to continue his growth at the plate, there was no doubt he was a top notch defensive player in the center of the diamond.

That is where things get interesting.

Many, including me, have said that upon Sizemore’s healthy return, he should be moved to Left so Brantley is free to roam in Center, his natural position. While we all are wowed by Grady’s great range and speed, his arm is one of the worst in the game. Over the past three seasons, teams have liberally run on him every chance they could. Brantley on the other hand, has the range of a healthy Sizemore AND a cannon throwing arm.

Antonetti addressed that right out of the box last night, saying unequivocally that if Grady is healthy, he will be in Center.

“No. 1, that’s where he’s most comfortable,” Antonetti said. “No. 2, talking to our medical people, center field is less demanding on his knee because, while he may have to cover more ground out there, he doesn’t have to decelerate as quickly. In left and right field, you have to make a lot more quick stops.”

I understand Antonetti feeling the need to coddle his “star” player, but in reality, it is not what is best for the club right now. Sizemore’s contract has a team option in 2012 that is “manageable” ($8.5 million) for the Tribe’s current situation, but attractive to a big market team. The real reason Antonetti is putting his foot down on Grady in Center is that they not only need him to bounce back for their team to be successful, but though they would never say it publicly, they would love to have Sizemore get back to a max trade value so they can sell him off the way they did CC Sabathia, Cliff Lee, and Victor Martinez.

Think about it. They have a ready-made Centerfielder in Brantley that can be plugged right in and if they can get a king’s ransom (not like the Lee trade), it’s in their best interest to move Grady before he hits the free agent market.

But lets not get ahead of ourselves here. I’m just thinking in terms of 2011. The Tribe needs a healthy season from Sizemore as well as a return to the form that made him so good from 2005-2008. The last two seasons have been mostly lost. An outfield that features Grady, Brantley, and budding star Shin-Soo Choo is very formidable and a good base to build around.

Lets just hope Grady can regain his old form.

  • The Conductor

    Dear Chris,

    I don’t believe you.

    XOXO,

    Everyone

  • Garry Owen

    1. Shouldn’t that be Acta’s call, not Antonetti’s?

    2. If he’s talking about less strain from “deceleration,” I guess we can forget about him playing at 100%. Lines: Reading between them.

  • Alex

    I bet he’ll be hitting leadoff, too.

    *Rolls eyes*

  • http://serandez.blogspot.com Ezzie

    Best place to showcase him is in CF, and avoid injury at the same time. Makes sense to me.

  • NJ

    “Coddling”? Putting a player coming off surgery in a position that minimizes the chances of reinjury is coddling? Okay.

    I’d like to see eventually see Brantley in center too, but if this gives Grady the best chance to excel then I’m all for it.

  • brwnsgrl

    I too would rather see Sizemore in left and Brantley in center. Grady’s advantage in center was always his speed, and that might have been compromised. I guess giving him his position back is only fair, but I hope that if it doesn’t work out, they move Brantley back to center.

    I don’t know if I’m really buying the “left and right field is harder on your knees” thing, but I’m not medical people, as Antonetti calls them.

  • JRS19

    This is a no-win situation for us fans. If Grady continues to struggle getting back to form, then he spends the year off and on the DL and we get nothing of value from one of our best players. If he gets back at it and is crushing the ball again, then he is traded in July for a couple of fringe pitchers and utility infielders named Jason.

  • Matt S

    They’re likely not trading Grady anytime soon…

    The team wants to contend in 2012. I think they need Grady to do that. Brantley was okay last year, but he didn’t hit well and he still doesn’t get the best read on the ball when it’s hit. He’s an average or below average CF, depending on who you talk to. A healthy and productive Grady is better than that.

    Furthermore, as has been reported, the “team option” for 2012 becomes a player option if he’s traded. And that’s going to scare away a few teams. It’s one thing to add the 1/4 of a player’s remaining salary at the deadline over one year (for reference, the Yankees ended up paying all of Wood’s remaining salary, about $2.5M out of the $10M yearly salary he was pulling down). But teams won’t be as anxious to be on the hook for $8M next year to pay a guy who’s been seriously injury prone and has been in decline production-wise when he IS healthy.

  • Tommy

    I think you may be assuming a bit too much by saying they are planning to play Grady in center to boost his value for the inevitable upcoming trade.

    I think it probably has more to do with Brantley than anything. It would be a pretty awkward situation to essentially demote Grady and then have to come back to him mid-season and say they made a mistake because Brantley’s bat isn’t productive enough to keep an everyday spot in the lineup. You have to think that would kill any shot we would have of resigning him at a discount if that becomes something we want to explore.

  • Harv 21

    If healthy, Grady is gone.

    Dumping every salary in that range possible the last few seasons, looming free agency, competing for league-low attendance, owners with no separate revenue source … what are we even talking about here except the best way to turn established players into prospects. Whatever.

  • Charles

    I have no idea why were shuffling pieces around for Brantley when he hasn’t shown anything more in the majors than Trevor Crowe has. Brantley can leadoff and play CF when he finally proves he can do those things well. That hasn’t happened yet.