May 24, 2013

NFL Players Association Asking Too Much of Undrafted Players

Labor disputes are never pretty. We knew that when the NFL Players Association decertified in an attempt to preempt any potential lockout that this process was going to become long and ugly. The problem with these kind of disputes is that often times there are a lot of innocent bystanders who get hurt in the process.

I’m not just talking about the fans, although they certainly are being unfairly asked to watch these two entities whine in public about how to split billions of dollars. I’m not talking about the run of the mill people who are employed by the teams, whether it be ushers, ticket salespeople, secretaries, etc, who potentially face job insecurity if there’s no football this fall.

No, I’m actually talking about some of the players themselves. Well, to be more accurate, I’m talking about future players. The guys who are currently former college football players but not yet professional football players. I’m talking about the draft prospects.

For anyone not following this case and who wasn’t yet heard, it was announced yesterday that the players union, or rather, whatever it is they want to call themselves in the wake of their fake decertification, has asked the top draft prospects who would normally be invited to New York City for the draft, to stay away.

Which is funny in and of itself for two reasons. First of all, the union decertified. They should no long have the authority to tell the players to do anything if they’re serious about being decertified. Furthermore, as Mike Florio pointed out at PFT, even if they were still a union, the players don’t actually become members of the union until they are drafted, so the union never really had this authority to begin with.

Regardless, the players union is treading a fine line here. I pointed out in the comments yesterday that I was leaning more toward the owners in the first place, but this petty act on the part of the players has pushed me over the edge.

What’s funny is that in principle I agree with the players. I think it’s absurd for the owners to ask the players to give back more money and play 2 extra games every season without opening their books and showing the players why this is necessary. But the actions of the players union in recent weeks has been offensive to me. For all the talk about who is locking out whom, the reality is that it was the players who chose decertification and litigation over another extension which would have allowed good faith negotiations to continue. The owners made concessions and showed us that they were willing to give on issues in order to keep negotiations moving forward. It was the players’ choice to get us to this point.

Again, though, this is all secondary to the main point at hand. The sad truth is that some young men are about to be seriously robbed of one of the biggest moments of their lives. They are about to lose the reward they’ve earned for all the years of hard work and sacrifice they have made. For a college player, the ultimate dream is to be a top pick in the NFL Draft. To be invited to the big city. To hear your name called and get to walk on stage, shake the commissioner’s hand, put on your new team’s hat, hold up your jersey, have your picture taken, and talk to the media in attendance. It’s a chance to share such a monumental moment with your family members, many of whom have also sacrificed for the players to be there.

The union says it is looking out for the best interests of the players, but I can’t see how this is what’s best for them. What’s truly best for them would be for the union to allow them to go to the draft with their families, let them go through the process, let them fly to the city they are drafted and meet with the coaches to get their playbook and any instructions/advice, let them meet the local media, and then join the other players in staying away. I fail to see what the harm would be in this situation.

It would be good for the players to have their moment as well as to be able to get some information from their teams on what to expect, how they might be used, and things they should be working on while locked out. It would be good for the fans to still get to experience the draft they love and to get a brief introduction to their new favorite players. Instead, the union continues to suck the joy out of football.

Obviously under the laws of this nation, the players union is not doing anything they don’t have the right to do. But just because you have the right to do something, it doesn’t mean you are immune from criticism for your actions. The union is wrong here, and they know it.

When the immediate loud criticism began raining down on them yesterday, they quickly leaked information to let everyone know they were merely offering abstaining from the draft as a “suggestion” to the players, not an order. Now they’re talking about a number of other ridiculous alternatives, including holding their own ceremonies elsewhere in New York City and/or doing some kind of bizarre social media coverage of the players who get drafted.

No matter how you spin it, it’s still an alternative. It’s not the real deal, and it’s a moment these players will never get back. The Players Association had better think long and hard about whether they really want to be so vindictive as to take away this moment from players who haven’t even yet had a voice in their union yet. Dragging young men into the ugliness of this war before they’ve even yet to earn one single paycheck or play in one single game seems to me to be a bit much.

Hopefully the players union will come to their senses and do the right thing and let the players attend the draft. Furthermore, hopefully both the players and the owners can all get their heads on straight and find a solution to this problem without dragging this out in court. Don’t cross your fingers on that one, though. With no more rights to collectively bargain thanks to this decertification charade, this situation seems almost certain to drag out the entire summer. Enjoy your offseason, football fans.

_____

Photo Credit: (Photo by Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images)

  • dwhit110

    2 ways to look at this… The other way is by asking perspective players to show up at the Draft, Management is trying to get players to do something that they’re not being paid for.

    Does that make prospective-draftees who show up scabs? Maybe…

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Craig Lyndall

    Unfortunately some players think the draft is their destination rather than actually playing out their rookie deal. I’m looking at you Vernon Gholston.

    Seriously though, I agree with you Andrew. The player’s union is asking this of these young men, while simultaneously (I think) agreeing that a rookie wage scale is necessary. Even if these rooks will eventually agree with their union on this point, if you ask those top ten picks whether they should have such a restriction placed on their rookie contracts, you can bet what their answer would be.

  • Mark

    Really Andrew? This is what put you over the edge and into the owners camp? This? It’s like complaining that you don’t like a meal because of where they put the parsley on your plate. This stupid idea by the union shouldn’t have one bit of influence on the negotiations or opinions of it.

    That being said, it is pretty dumb of the union to ask this of the draftees and helps them not one bit. I would be surprised if the drafteest didn’t show and get their day in the sun. They should go. They deserve it.

  • BB

    What I’m interested to see is if Von Miller inclusion in the lawsuit against the owners will affect when he is drafted.

  • Matt

    Count me in the “Thanks for backing up the union and not showing up to the draft rookies, we’d like to thank you all by taking away your millions in guaranteed contracts and replacing them with a rookie wage scale” camp.

  • NJ

    A couple points – however you may personally feel about labor law and the tactic of decertification, characterizing the NFLPA’s decert as “fake” is just plain wrong. It’s legal and legit. They are now considered a “trade association” rather than a “union”.

    Second – maybe I’m wrong, but did the NFLPA ever ask rookies to boycott the draft? All I saw was that ESPN reported that they were thinking about it. Can someone point me to a quote or press release from the NFLPA asking for a boycott? Since when does weighing your options deserve harsh criticism?

    Even if they did, I don’t get how a poorly thought out, annoying tactic like a draft boycott trumps the straight up lies and dishonesty coming from the owners.

    Lastly, I think this whole “court of public opinion” stuff is utter nonsense. It doesn’t matter at all and will have zero effect on actual labor negotiations.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Andrew

    @NJ: There are links in this article that discuss this, but here’s the exact quote from the story:

    “The NFLPA already has contacted 17 top prospects who ordinarily would have received an invitation to attend the draft and informed them not to go.”

  • NJ

    One last point – you keep acting like the NFLPA can force (or has tried to force) the rookies to boycott (or do anything).

    “They should no long have the authority to tell the players to do anything…”

    “…are about to be seriously robbed of one of the biggest moments of their lives.”

    “…to take away this moment from players…”

    “… do the right thing and let the players attend the draft.”

    Your flair for the dramatic aside, how is the NFLPA doing any of this? They never “told” anyone anything, nor are they “robbing” rookies of an experience, nor are they “taking away” moments, nor do they have the power to “let” or deny rookies from attending the draft. Your rhetoric is blatantly misleading.

    At worst, the NFLPA said to rookies – ‘dudes, you’re going to be one of us very soon. We’re a tight knitted bunch in a tough fight that’s trying to keep what we have as a group. Please, think about backing us up on this one because it’ll help us all in the long run.”

  • NJ

    Thanks. But that’s my point – it’s a report from ESPN from an unnamed source. Nothing official from the NFLPA. And just because Schefter uses the term “inform them not to go”, I don’t think it’s fair to present it as though the NFLPA is barring rookies from going to the draft. Again, they don’t have the power to do so.

    I’ll agree with this larger point – the NFLPA should just shut the heck up. Again, who cares about public opinion? You’ve got the judge on your side. Sit down and zip it.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Andrew

    If we set naivete aside, it’s quite clear that the NFLPA can exert pressure on these kids to do what they want them to do. If the NFLPA doesn’t want them at the draft, they won’t be there, end of story. Just because they’re decertified now doesn’t mean they can’t threaten them with exclusion once they are inevitably recertified as a union after this mess is over.

    And if you actually read the links in this story, the NFLPA absolutely told the kids, at a minimum, that they recommend they stay away from the draft. This has nothing to do with my “flair for the dramatic”. It has to do with the facts as they are actually being reported.

    “The NFLPA already has contacted 17 top prospects who ordinarily would have received an invitation to attend the draft and informed them not to go.

    Later Monday, a source said the edict is a recommendation, not an explicit order not to attend the draft.

    “As of right now, this is 100 percent happening,” one source familiar with the NFL Players Association’s thinking said earlier Monday. “This is going down.”"

  • NJ

    I have a real problem with the vague term “informed them not to go”. Notice that said portion isn’t even in quotes in the original Schefter report. So that’s not what the source said, but Schefter’s characterization, interpretation of it.

    And what does that mean – “Informed them not to go”? Informed them that they shouldn’t go? Couldn’t go? That there’d be repercussions? My question: What did the NFLPA actually say to them?

    I’m just not ready to attack the league based on Adam Schefter’s vague characterization of a report from an unnamed source.

    I’m also fairly sure that legally the NFLPA could not excluded nor threaten a rookie with exclusion. Too lazy to Google that one right now.

    I just have a hard time buying that the PA would tell rookies, “you can’t go to the draft”. Since they legally CANNOT do that, why would they do so and risk the fallout, both publicly and legally?

  • christopher

    ugh, crybaby millionaires fighting with crybaby billionaires…i think the judge should make both sides of the argument collect trash or cashier at Wal-Mart for a month as the settlement.

    /over it.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Andrew

    All those things are the same. Whether the NFLPA says don’t/can’t/shouldn’t/whatever….it’s all to the same effect. It’s all about making sure the rookies don’t show up at the draft. That’s what I have a problem with.

    However they specifically worded it, their intention is the same. You’re trying to twist things around and change the focus from the real issue at hand. The NFLPA doesn’t want the players to go to the draft, and they’ve informed them of such. I have a problem with this, and that’s what this article was about.

  • NJ

    Fair enough. I get that.

    I just see this all as typical, ugly, stupid labor negotiation posturing that distracts from the real issues. And there, I honestly think the players have a legit case. This ill-conceived media stunt doesn’t bother me 1/100th as much as the things Judge Doty said in his finding about the NFL TV deals.

  • Wyatt

    There is no way that the drafted players should physically attend the draft. It basically adds up to the owners and league saying “ok guys, come to this event (without being paid) so that your employer can make a giant profit and further their public profile, but as soon as it’s over, you have no access to any of your team facilities, coaches, trainers, or other resources”. I understand that it would be a huge moment for a young man to walk up on the stage to meet the commissioner and owner/F.O. of the team that drafted him, but the NFL didn’t design the fanfare to make the drafted players feel special, they designed it to make themselves millions of extra $

  • Dave

    Maybe the League should counter with “In order to be eligible for selection in the top 10 slots you must be in attendance”. Most jobs require you show up for orientation before you even join the union, and in this case there is no union anyway by their own decertification.

  • Dawgpoundgal

    The NFLPA is putting the rookies in an impossible situation…anger your new owner/GM/Head Coach or anger your future teammates. These guys should not have to make this decision but it appears they will. That being said, I wouldn’t expect the NFLPA to sit idly by while the draft goes on as always. However, it is inappropriate to put the rookies in the middle (especially since they want a new rookie wage scale)! That’s like putting the kids in the middle of a nasty divorce.

  • Jim

    The prospects deserve this day. All the hard work they have put in to this point should be recognized. It only happens once (draft) in a carreer . I just hope there not looked at as traitors in the long run . I know I wouldn’t look at them that way . GO BROWNS !