Cavaliers Facing a New Future in the Wake of a Rewritten History
May 26, 2011On Worrying and Not Worrying About the Indians
May 26, 2011Not that anyone really cares, but I first must say that I am happy for Mike Brown. By all accounts, Brown is one of the true gentlemen in the game of professional basketball. Now that he will be the Lakers’ head coach, he has landed the premier coaching position in the game this side of maybe Boston. I must say though, I sure hope Brown follows the path of another head coach who was once run out of Cleveland; Bill Belichick.
Belichick wasn’t the super-genius that he would later reveal as head coach of the New England Patriots. Belichick had to take steps along the way including valuable lessons in what not to do in Cleveland. And really, who could blame him? He was a first-time head coach here. Same with Mike Brown.
Brown was a rookie head coach with terrific pedigree from the Spurs organization. That same organization is the one that humbled Brown and the Cavaliers in 2007 by sweeping the Cavaliers out of the NBA Finals. After winning a whole lot of basketball games and getting a coach of the year award, Brown was summarily dismissed after the Cavaliers faded (I’m being kind) as LeBron James was plotting his exit from Cleveland.
The history books will probably just look at the win totals and blame LeBron for his firing, but Brown had a hand in it too. Brown’s own mysterious handle on the Cavaliers offense after losing offensive coordinator John Kuester had a lot to do with it. A mysterious set of rotations, which included benching J.J. Hickson after he started much of the season were all a part of the strange, inexplicable voodoo that ended up putting the nail in his coaching career coffin in Cleveland.
Some have already re-written that history and forgotten that Brown sometimes seemed listless dealing with veteran personalities, rotations and in-game adjustments over the years in Cleveland. That’s fine, but those of us who watched over the years know the truth. Mike Brown’s teams played exceptional basketball at times including dominant defense. He had a reticence to develop younger players, and struggled with rotations and offensive philosophy. He also never seemed to impose his will that the LeBron James dribble-out-the-clock-at-the-top-of-the-key-and-jack-a-fade-away play to end quarters and games was unacceptable. Those are the facts. Mike Brown teams had flashes of brilliance, but seemed to hang by a thread over a cliff a lot of the time. It seems impossible to say considering how many games the Cavaliers won with Brown at the helm. I still believe it to be true, though.
The job should be a little bit easier in L.A. you would think because the personalities that are there working together have already proven that they are good enough to win a championship. Then again, to think that he won’t have egos to manage between Kobe, Lamar Odom, Pau Gasol and the rest is unrealistic. Because I like Brown, I hope he learned a few things from his time and ultimate exit from Cleveland. He needs to do more than just bring his brand of defensive toughness that everyone knows about. He must continue his path toward being a well-rounded head coach. If he doesn’t, his stay in L.A. will be significantly shorter than he had in Cleveland.
10 Comments
I fear the deck is stacked against Coach Brown, but I really hope he finds a way to succeed. At least until the Cavaliers are back to relevance. But I always liked Mike Brown and I harbor no ill will towards him.
I never liked his coaching. Love his passion for D, but his rotations & offense were too much for me to handle.
wish him well but no way the Lakers succeed with him at the helm.
Great article! Did anyone see the funny story on the Lakers pick-up game?
@Lyon, I just mentioned this in the other thread. He will only be viewed as a success if they win the title (in L.A.), thus unfortunately the deck IS stacked against him.
People rarely understand /mention that the offense lapses were not 100% the fault of Mike Brown; a huge portion of the blame was on LeBron.
Mike Brown sent in plays, Mo called the plays, players got into their sets, the ball was eventually passed to LeBron and from there …..disaster or glory.
LeBron CONSTANTLY broke off the called play forcing the rest of the offense to either play streetball or stand still and wait for him to “do his thing”
It used to drive me insane when national media would fault the other players for “just standing there”….when it was LeBron that was forcing them into that.
I really do hope big success for Coach Brown in L.A. I think his success will be based on whether or not he has learned the ability to deal with the ego of his player(s) and control when his players do not respond to his coaching/play calling.
Christopher nothing that went wrong in Cleveland was Lebron’s fault, or so we were led to believe. I think this could work out for Brown. Kobe knows he only has a few years left so he can be the driving force the team will hopefully follow.
@JM
MMmmmMM….LeBron Kool-Aid!
*tastes great for 7 years but has a tendency to spoil immediatley after
I like the headline the way it is
Blaming Mike Brown for the offense is the lowest form of analysis possible. Cleveland.com is laughing at that. Krolik puts it best.
http://www.cavstheblog.com/?p=1567
Brown’s offense was efficient with or without Kuester. Also which players got better offensively when they got away from Brown?
Mike Brown is a great coach. I hate to say this, but I think I’m going to be a Laker fan next year. Heck, I’m a huge Mavs fan at the moment too.