June 19, 2013

MLB Trading Block: Mets Looking to Shop Wright?

Another guest post today, this time from Al DiFranco. It seems the Mets are a mess and are looking to deal Reyes or Wright or both. Al thinks the Indians should take a chance on David Wright.

Earlier today, ESPNNewYork.com cited sources indicating that Mets 3B David Wright may be on the trade block. Wright is under contract for two more years at around $14-$15 million per year (guaranteed deal in 2012, team option in 2013). Why should we care in Cleveland? While many see Wright as more of a candidate to be traded in the off-season, I think it’s time for the Cleveland Indians to make a phone call to the Mets and explore a trade for Wright right now.

Wright is 28 years old. He has spent his entire major league career in a Mets uniform. In his six-plus seasons with the Mets, he has a batting average of .302, with a .382 on-base percentage, 175 homeruns, and 682 runs batted in. He followed up a disappointing 2009 with a solid campaign last season (.283-29-103). Wright is a solid fielder at the hot corner, which is important in this discussion because Jack Hannahan has played a Gold Glove-caliber third base for the Indians.

Wright is currently on the DL with a back injury. According to SI.com’s Will Carroll, Wright’s time on the DL is winding down and he should be back on the active roster in the next week or so. He was struggling when he went on the DL, batting just .226, but he played through the pain for weeks before going on the DL.

The Indians’ line-up is in desperate need of a good right-handed bat. Look at the line-up Manny Acta will likely run with once Travis Hafner returns from his oblique injury:

LF Brantley (left)

SS A. Cabrera (switch)

RF Choo (left)

DH Hafner (left)

C Santana (switch)

CF Sizemore (left)

2B O. Cabrera (right)

1B LaPorta (right)

3B Hannahan (left)

This lineup is heavy on left-handed bats, especially in the middle. Now, compare this to a lineup with David Wright replacing Jack Hannahan at third base and moving into the cleanup spot:

LF Brantley (left)

SS A. Cabrera (switch)

RF Choo (left)

3B Wright (right)

DH Hafner (left)

C Santana (switch)

CF Sizemore (left)

1B LaPorta (right)

2B O. Cabrera (right)

This is a much more balanced lineup not only in the middle, but even when the lineup is turned over from LaPorta and Orlando Cabrera to Brantley at the top, since the Indians wouldn’t have Hannahan’s unproductive bat to hide at the bottom of the order.

Now, let’s talk about what it would take to acquire David Wright. The Mets currently own a record of 25-29, which has them 8.5 games out of first in the NL East. With the Phillies and Marlins both off to very good starts, and the Braves also playing well, the Mets have to begin the process of looking ahead to next season and beyond.

The Indians can put together a very enticing package of prospects for David Wright. That package would likely have to include their top position player prospect, Lonnie Chisenhall. Chisenhall, who at age 23 has had his ups and downs in his first season at the AAA level (.265-5-26), would provide the Mets with a very good replacement for Wright going into the 2012 season.

In addition to Chisenhall, the Indians would likely need to part with one of their better pitching prospects. I keep looking ahead to a 2013 rotation of Masterson-White-Pomeranz-Tomlin-Carrasco, so anyone outside of these five starters should be looked at as possible trade pieces. The best of the rest is probably Jason Knapp, the 20-year old acquired in the Cliff Lee trade, but his continued injury woes make him an untradeable commodity at this point. A guy really turning heads right now in the Indians farm system is Zach McAllister, who was acquired from the Yankees last season. McAllister has had a phenomenal season so far for Columbus, winning seven of his eight decisions and posting an ERA of 2.42. He has struck out 53 and walked just 13 in 67 innings. McAllister, who was selected in the third round of the 2006 draft, was one of the Yankees’ top prospects until last season, when he struggled at the AAA level. He has regained his command and would be a good candidate for the Mets’ starting rotation in 2012, if not sooner.

A third and final player I would suggest to include would be either Jason Kipnis or Cord Phelps. The Mets need help at second base, and that seems to be the best position for both Kipnis and Phelps at the major league level. Kipnis, the Tribe’s second-round pick in 2009, got off to a slow start this season in Columbus, but has rebounded to post solid numbers (.288-5-30). Phelps, a third-round pick in 2008, has been a stat stuffer (.315-7-38) but is in his second season at the AAA level. Both are 24 years of age. Phelps is a switch-hitter, while Kipnis bats left-handed. Either of these two youngsters would provide the Mets with a very solid infield prospect.

Does this sound too good to be true? It probably is. The Mets would most likely look at the Indians’ prospect pool and covet Alex White or Drew Pomeranz in a package for Wright. Then again, the package of Chisenhall-McAllister-Kipnis/Phelps has the Indians trading three of their top 10-15 prospects for a 28-year old player whom the Mets need to deal to help bring down their payroll. That seems to be a win-win scenario.

The Mets are in a similar position with David Wright that the Indians were in with Victor Martinez two seasons ago. They have a beloved player on their roster who makes more money than the team can afford in their current financial state. They can either keep the player and force themselves to build from within, or they can speed up the rebuilding process by bringing in some good prospects.

From the Tribe’s standpoint, this is the kind of move that many fans have been advocating for years.

It’s time for the Dolans to invest in their roster and add a player like David Wright. This kind of move would give fans who are uncertain about the team’s direction another reason to buy tickets. It’s time to become a buyer and explore a trade like this. It’s Tribe Time…NOW!

  • saggy

    The Mets have absolutely no leverage to deal. It has been publicized in every square inch of every New York paper how financially unfit they are. I mean, they just had to sell a part of the team, and will likely have to sell more.

    The Indians should strike now, before the Mets trade away anyone valuable. The Wilpons have made it known that they will not be re-signing Jose Reyes either, so you can expect him to be dealt in August, too.

    If there was ever a time to spend, it is now, while the Tribe brass can basically call the shots.

  • SwingAndADrive

    Interesting, I wouldn’t mind seeing Wright in the lineup. However, would Wright’s contract prevent us from locking up AC, Choo, or Masterson long term? Trading a combination of Chisenhall, Kipnis, and McAllister would really weaken the farm system.

  • GhostToMost

    I like this idea. We have a surplus of infielders in our system, Im sure we could part with one of them. Especially since Wright is only 28. Maybe a pitcher as well, although I would be hesitant to deal McAllister without getting a look at him in the big leagues.

    Another possibility if they are looking to rent a bat for the second half of the season, Carlos Beltran. Beltran is 34 and in the last year of his contract, they could probably get him for next to nothing given his struggles with injuries over the past couple of seasons.

  • bobby

    I almost think Chis, Mcallister and one of the two 2nd base prospects is too much. In every deal the Indians brought back someone in AA or even single A. If we do say Chis a pitching prospect then a “high upside” guy in single or double A then I like it more.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com/ Rick

    I would be terrified of Wright’s back. 28 years old and facing possible back surgery? Not sure that his bat this season is the difference maker. If he was producing at the normal .308/30/100 clip then maybe…

  • BillTheHammer

    No

  • Stinkfist

    I have grown so irritated seeing the 1st and 3rd basemen hitting in the bottom of the order. Something needs to change. If this is it, thats fine by me

  • Harv 21

    Like Wright and the way that new lineup looks, but really doubt Dolans can take on the added $7m this year (half season), $15m next and $16m if they exercise the team 2013 option.

    The other problem is that back injuries are tricky and he better be 100% this year, this playoff drive, because with his contract he would be a short-term rental. Next year they would look to move him again and size of his salary will limit the market. Grady will also me moved, and if you’ve given up too many prospects their attendance will plummet, again. Believe the salary size and duration will not permit this. I think they’d more likely shop in the $7-9m bin.

  • mgbode

    a 28yo w/ back concerns, a slumping bat, and only 2 years left on the contract. for our 2 best position prospects and a good pitching prospect? no way in holy heck.

    now, if Wright proves he is healthy and the Mets are willing to accept Chis + Donald + a lower pitching prospect (maybe a guy like Kluber), then we can talk.

  • mgbode

    @Harv – some truth in that, but the Dolans only recently were willing to spend $81mil on salary expecting 25K+ (2008). We’re only getting 19K in attendance, but that number is rising and the overall number is lagging from the dreadful April numbers.

    Still, at $49mil in salary, you would have to think the $7mil for this season is not a concern. The $15mil each of the next 2 seasons obviously would be unless we truly believe we will be contending the next 2 seasons as well and have the attendance to match it (w/ others likely in line for salary bumps as well).

  • mgbode

    oh, and I would prefer Jose Reyes anyway. A whole lot cheaper (as he’s a 3-4month rental before his contract expires) and he bumps O-Cab out of the lineup and gives us another dynamic option both in the field and at the plate. The only issue is if Asdrubel is willing to go back to 2B for the rest of the year to make a WS run (I think he’d make the switch easier and Jose has better range at SS).

  • GhostToMost

    The back issue with Wright is a concern. I really like this idea but Harv brings up a good point. Im not sure that Dolan is willing and/or able to take on Wrights salary. I almost like the idea of renting Beltran better. With the Mets desperate to shed payroll, and Beltran being 34 with an injury history of his own, we could probably get him for a bag of peanuts. His contract is up at the end of the season, so Dolan wouldnt have to worry about paying his salary for 2012.

    With Beltran being a guy who can play multiple outfield positions, we could get a platoon going between he, Brantley and Sizemore. This way Grady doesnt have to play CF everyday, and we arent stuck with Shelley Duncan or Kearns in left field when Brantley is in center.

  • BisonDeleSightings

    Too much money. I’d rather keep Chisenhall and McAllister.

  • jimkanicki

    four of the brightest WFNY already said what i’m thinking:

    BACK ISSUES?!

    i’d take him for a test drive for jeanmar gomez and luis valbuena. that’s about it.

  • Scotty

    I agree 100% with bobby and mgbode. We aren’t deep enough at pitcher to trade away our best AAA prospects at that position. Especially for a guy who may or may not be 100%

  • Ben

    No. No. No.

    Back issues at his age…Eric Chavez Part 2

  • false~cognate

    Yeah, let’s jettison all these guys who they’ve been so careful about with service time right when they’re about ready for an overpaid 28 year-old former all-star (because that’s been working really well for the White Sox)… *facepalm*

  • Vengeful Pat

    I like it, but I think we could get Wright cheaper. he’s a solid player when healthy, so i’d want to have as much inside knowledge as possible about his back before proceeding.

  • NJ

    Put me in the “big fat no” column.

    There is NOTHING I hate more in sports than hypothetical trades. Absolutely nothing. It reminds me of when I was like twelve and would come up with absurd scenarios where Koko B. Ware beats Hulk Hogan for the world championship.

  • OmegaKing

    I don’t want to jump in here and question this – but was he having chronic back issues before the fracture he suffered? If not, and he’s healed, why is everyone acting like he’s a crippled-up old man?

  • bobby

    Just saying- if they did pull this trade they can wait til August until he plays full time. Hannahan has been fine, but I do think if they want to try to go all the way they either need a big bat threat or another lights out pitcher (since Fausto is so off and on). If they let Wright rest and rehab properly the back will not be a huge problem. The thing with baseball is its an everyday thing. I would take him out of baseball and strictly rehab until the all star break then bring him in through the Akron and Cbus so come August he his hopefully back at the top of his game. An injury if properly dealt with will not be an issue. The Indians arent in a huge need now so they can afford to play it slow. Even if they dip to .500 by August, there is no need to rush it.

  • Boney

    If Acta batted Wright 4th, that would be the second time he’s put the incorrect hitter in the 4 hole.

    Wright would be arguably one of the Indians’ top hitters, and should hit in either the 3 or 5, 6 spot in the lineup

    LF Brantley
    RF Choo
    3B Wright
    DH Hafner
    CF Sizemore
    C Santana

    that’s a pretty good front 6. Wright is not a cleanup hitter, just like Santana isn’t

  • AndyB

    Unless we can totally fleece them (like Valbuena, Donald, Kearns, Crowe, and/or 1 or 2 Class A/AA prospects), I’d pass. Chis may not be able to put up his numbers this year, but I’d rather have a healthy 3B than one with a history of back problems.

  • kdev

    Do you realize what team you are covering? Trade our top 3 prospects for an overpaid 3B with a history of back issues who is owed $30 million over the next 2 seasons? Did Dan Gilbert buy the Indians, or are you suffering from some sort of concussion?

    I love me some WFNY, but this may be the most far-fetched piece yet. If we were going to commit $30 million to this roster, wouldn’t you rather see it spent on locking up Choo, Cabrera and possibly one of our young pitchers to long term deals? How does David Wright @$15 per year for 2 years help us? He’d undoubtedly be gone after that, so, basically you are suggesting we throw away the depth we have worked so hard for (via merciless losing) to acquire David Wright for what would be a prolonged rental? Why can’t I stop asking rhetorical questions?!?!?

    Love your work, but this is crazy talk.

  • Matt S

    A person with connections to the Tribe, on the Indians possibly acquiring Carlos Beltran (making $18.5M this year, would add about $6M to the payroll if acquired at the deadline), said that they don’t have the money to do that

    That would be a one-year rental, not somebody that they would have to commit additional resources to in the future. That may seem odd given the current small size of the payroll. However, you have to realize that the payroll will jump next year even without new money added to the team. Sizemore and Carmona get a pay bump. Choo and Cabrera go to round 2 of arbitration. Several more guys will get to arby year 1 (Masterson being the most important of that group). Oh, and the Indians still aren’t drawing that well, currently in the bottom 5 in attendance.

    NO WAY you mortgage the future of the team on Wright.

  • King Zak

    Noticed this article. You have to realize the mets are only shopping him. As a Met fan one flaw I noticed with this article is that the mets are not willing to trade Wright for nothing. Assuming the Mets dont resign Reyes and most certainly dont resign Beltran that would mean the mets will have 3 first round picks plus 2 sandwich picks. Plus the 13th and 44th pick in this years draft. I really dont think we are that desperate to trade Wright.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com DP

    If we’re going to mortgage for a rental bat, go after Pujols.

    (looks around to see if anyone thinks I’m serious…)

  • http://serandez.blogspot.com Ezzie

    Plus, maybe tonight is an example of how well the Indians can really hit…

    (looks around to see if anyone thinks I’m serious…)

  • B-Dubbs

    are you serious…. really… no, no, no, no… i have spent to many years telling myself that we are building for the future, and the key to our future success is in our farm system, this is why we traded so many of our favs to acquire these prospects, not only are these guys our future, but in the next few years we will have so much competition for starting spots in the lineup that then we can maybe trade away some of the guys, but i will not stand for us trading our guys who i have been told are the future for an expensive David wright, now if we can trade a struggling team for a first baseman not named laPorta i would be willing to talk.

  • Chief Wahoos This

    Insane. Chisenhall, Kipnis, Knapp, McAllister are the future of this team. I would never make this deal, and neither would any professional GM. Unless he was the METS’ GM.

  • Jim

    So let’s start with the obvious:

    1) in no way are the Indians trading for a player making $14 million a year. While the Dolan’s have indicated they would spend when the time is right, I don’t think they had in mind trading for a guy making 1/4 of their entire payroll.

    2) David Wright’s solid numbers will go down when he goes to the A.L. It happens all the time. This means you traded three of your top five prospects for an above average 3rd basemen. Making $14 million a year.

    3) You do this deal if you’re the Indians if you are absolutely, positively sure you can win this season. As much fun as this season has been thus far, I still have my doubts that this team is one player away form legitimately competing. The offense is hit or miss and the starting pitching is starting to regress back to the mean. Fortunately the Tribe plays in the weak AL Central where everyone can compete.

  • Al DiFranco

    Thanks to everyone for sharing their pros and cons on my proposed deal. Hopefully the Indians will at least begin to explore being a buyer in the trade market as the season progresses. The biggest needs to me are the corner positions and a starter. To acquire someone of value, we are going to have to part with prospects, which is what I explored in this article. It will be interesting to see what players become available this summer.

  • Illmatic8

    I would love to acquire David Wright. When he’s healthy, he’s an MVP candidate. Prospects are just that…prospects. Less than half pan out at the major league level. We’ve seen more than a few “can’t miss” prospects turn out to be mediocre on the Tribe.

  • jmoney

    someone send the Dolans a letter, this deal needs to happen..

  • Steve

    I’m not as down on trading for Wright as most here. Remember the basic rule of dealing – buy low, sell high. You can’t buy much lower on a multiple all-star still near the top of his aging curve. Obviously the talent the writer suggests to give away is ridiculous. And of course, despite the Indians very recent resurgence at the box office, its tough to guarantee revenue the next two years. These fans will turn on the team just as quickly as they hopped on the bandwagon.

  • Jake

    I’d like to see them pull this deal ONLY if we believe we can sign our current guys long term and Wright long term. Also, if Wilpons would be willing to eat the rest of Wright’s 2011 salary (ala casey blake for carlos santana ’08), then i think its worthy of Chiz, McAllister and Kipper. Would I rather deal Donald, Valbuena, Kluber and a project? Sure. But the fact remains is that Wright is proven, while Chiz and Kip are not. By the way, we got McAllister from the Yanks for two months for a backup LF. Its not like the guy is the next Felix Hernandez or somethin.

    Look, the deal comes down to brass tax. You do the deal if you can eventually keep all these guys (Cabrera, Choo, Santana, Wright, Brantley, Pitchers, Sizemore) around for a long time, and try to build a Champion or even a dynasty (like if the 90′s Tribe would win like the Tim Duncan dynasty). If you cannot afford to keep these players, then don’t do the deal. But it should be because of $ and the future of the Tribe, not a couple of ok prospects in AAA.

  • Jim

    Zimmerman instead of Wright. But no way Wash. would give him up.