February 22, 2012

While We’re Waiting… Transcendent Jim Brown, Grading the Browns’ Offense and Slugging Percantages

While We’re Waiting serves as the early morning gathering of WFNY-esque information for your viewing pleasure. Have something you think we should see? Send it to our tips email at tips@waitingfornextyear.com

The piece on on Ali, but this was a great take on Jim Brown- “Jim Brown, I think, was like that for the late 1950s and early ’60s. Old football films of Jim Brown running do not jump off the screen the way they do for, say, Gale Sayers. You watch Gale Sayers highlights in 2012, and he feels just as amazing and surprising and alive as he did in 1966. He’s timeless that way. Not Jim Brown. I always thought on film he looks dated somehow, yellowed, like beauties from the Silent Film Era. It’s hard for film to capture Brown as he was in, say, 1958 or 1963 — the most astonishing football player ever. He was relentless, overpowering, overwhelming — he was bigger, faster, stronger and more determined than anyone else on the field. They knew he was going to get the ball. They always knew. And they could not stop him — 5.2 yards per carry for an entire career (nobody with 2,000 carries has averaged more than 5), 104.3 yards per game for an entire career (nobody else has averaged 100), led the league in rushing every year but one. But even these numbers, even the highlights that survive, none of them can explain Jim Brown. I grew up idolizing JIm Brown based only on the stories my father and his friends told me growing up in Cleveland, but in the end (they would tell me) I couldn’t really KNOW what he was really like.” [Posnanski/Joe Blogs]

Too high a grade? “No matter how you try to spin it, this was one of the worst offensive seasons for the Cleveland Browns since their return in 1999. Part of it stems from the front office’s conscious effort to make almost no offseason moves in an effort to truly gauge where the team was at talent-wise. Part of it also stems from the fact that the team is still trying to recover from some tremendously disappointing drafts before Tom Heckert and Mike Holmgren arrived.

Whatever the case may be, the point is that the Browns now know what they have, and it isn’t much. It is imperative that changes are made to the offense this offseason; otherwise, “blowing it up” and starting over once again will be a much more viable option. Overall grade: D-” [DiMatteo/Dawg Pound Daily]

“Wow, the early returns from this season of Cavaliers basketball have been above and beyond expectations through 12 games. While it seemed the team was going to have another poor year (most pundits predicted about 13-18 wins) the team has been flying high of late and surprised us all quite a bit. It’s truly a credit to Byron Scott for urging these guys on to get some tough road victories that in a 26 game losing streak type of season they weren’t going to come close to getting.

Contrary to what everyone thinks, the team hasn’t really played some atrocious schedule to boost their 6-6 record. With the 19th ranked schedule right now that suggests the team is pretty close to the middle of the pack in terms of schedule strength.” [John/Fear the Sword]

A primer on basic stats, this time slugging percentage- “I know some dislike the new stats, but they are now a part of baseball and are not going away. If anything they are getting even more complex. So what is slugging percentage? There is a basic and easy way to understand the formula for it. Slugging percentage is singles + (doubles x 2) + (triples x 3) + (home runs x 4) all divided by the players’ total number of at bats. The easier way is to say it is the total bases a player accumulates divided by the players’ at bats.

The league average for slugging percentage is often considered to be .400 to .415. For a player to have been exceptional last season and make the top 30 in both leagues he would have had to post a .495 SLG. As a comparion, last year the highest slugging percentage for the Indians was Asdrubal Cabrera’s .460 SLG, though Carlos Santana was close with a .457 SLG. They were 62nd and 66th in the league respectively, which shows how the Indians really did lack a credible consistent power threat.” [Ellis/Indians Prospect Insider]

Finally, pictures from the event I wish I could have made it to. The Uni-Watch Cleveland get together. [Uni-Watch]

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • Max

    out of curiosity, if you are getting paid ten million dollars a year, shouldn’t you be able to make personnel evaluations a little more quickly? If I was a plumber, went to someone’s house for a clogged drain and said “Well, lets watch this for a week or two, so we can see what kind of clog we have” I would be a not very busy plumber who has no money. So I don’t understand how its even acceptable…oh wait..the Bossman is in jolly old England rooting on his side as they take the pitch.  Randy Lerner doesn’t deserve the Browns.

  • boomhauertjs

    @Max – Randy Lerner, born on third, thinks he got a triple.

  • Max

    by the way…next season when the offense sucks, the excuse will be that they are under a new system with a new coordinator, and since the coordinator was brought in late, didn’t have the time to fully install his offense, so there will be some speed bumps and some growing pains but we should have ‘em right where we want ‘em in 2013…except by the Colt will be gone, and we will be starting over with another QB (who wont be Luck or Griffin by the way) and, as N.W.A. put it…the bleepitybleeping saga continues

    HIRE AN OC already..and DONT let Shurmur call plays. He’s busy enough on gameday. If he HAS to call plays, show him the door. Who is he to dictate terms to Mike Holmgren, Tom Heckert, or The Cleveland Browns?

  • http://twitter.com/oribiasi oribiasi

    Do they give out grades lower than “F”?  If so, I think we deserve like an “N” or a “Q.”

  • http://twitter.com/oribiasi oribiasi

    Wait, are you suggesting…nay, are you saying that they don’t really care who wins so long as they get their gigantic chunk of Randy Lerner’s money?

    Don’t fret; the true-believers, patience-lovers here will give very legit reasons why we also shouldn’t expect much from the team next year, no matter who we draft.

  • http://twitter.com/oribiasi oribiasi

    Well said, good sir.

  • Max

    no, Im sure they care. Legacies and whatnot. I don’t think Randy cares at all.  I think they think what they are doing is right, but what I can’t figure is what sort of logic they are using to draw those conclusions. I think they are making poor decisions, then when it comes to light that their choices are terrible,they try to pull the wool over the fan’s eyes.  It seems to me that, in their mind, the simple fan isn’t capable of understanding such complicated football topics, so they figure they can pee in our ears and tell us its raining because we are too stupid to know the difference

    “Tell me about the rabbits Mike. Will we live off the fatta the Lerner?”

  • http://twitter.com/oribiasi oribiasi

    Ha, nice Of Mice and Men reference.  To a former English undergraduate/graduate student, it drives the point home.

    I think you’re onto something about their opinion of the “simple-minded” football fan.  Trouble is, most of these simpletons knew/predicted a lot of the problems this year that we have experienced.  Maybe that makes them simple-minded-sooth-sayers ahhh the hell with it, too many words for my simple mind.

    The last string of hope I have for this regime is that they are indeed working some master plan behind the scenes in Oz that we don’t know about and when it does come to town it will shock and awe us into the playoffs. 

    When that doesn’t happen it’ll be curtains for these fools. 

  • Anonymous

    Cavs have beaten:

    3-11 Pistons
    3-11 Nets
    3-12 Bobcats (twice)
    5-8 Twolves
    4-9 Suns

    Each of those teams are in 4th or 5th place in their division.   Now, beating bad teams is the first step and is a good sign for our club.  But, saying they have had a middle of the road schedule without noting that we have only beaten the dregs on it is silly.

    The Cavs will end up with the low to upper 20 wins that we all expected and a lottery pick in the top10. 

  • Mark

    All of which, is exactly what we want. Beat some bad teams, miss the playoffs, get in the lottery and get lucky. All realistic and good goals for this year.

  • Anonymous

    Love the Pos.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com/ WFNYRick

    Indeed. Quality writer.

  • Anonymous

    The Pos that refreshes.