May 23, 2013

Draft Express Mock: Cavs Land Wildcats Kidd-Gilchrist, Lamb, Miller

Though the Kentucky Wildcats will likely lead all schools based on shear probability, Draft Express’ latest mock draft has the Cleveland Cavaliers leaving the late-June selection with three players who recently cut down the nets as NCAA champions.

With what amounts to the third-overall selection, the Cavaliers, per Draft Express, will select Kentucky forward Michael-Kidd Gilchrist, who would instantly slot in as the teams starting small forward having the character and work ethic that makes Chris Grant and Byron Scott salivate coupled with the chemistry already existing between he and his former high school teammate Kyrie Irving. The 6-foot-7-inch Kidd-Gilchrist averaged 11.9 points, 7.4 rebounds, 1.0 steals and 0.9 blocks for the Wildcats. He will not turn 19 until late September.

Merely serving to add to the chemistry would be the pair of second-round selections, shooting guard Doron Lamb and small forward Darius Miller, both wing players from Kentucky who ran along side Kidd-Gilchrist for John Calipari. These three players, with Miller being the oldest at 22 years of age, would sandwich Evan Fournier, the highly-touted 19-year-old out of France who possesses attributes with a 6-foot-7-inch frame, providing the ability to create his own shot very effectively thanks to his excellent size, strength, and ball-handling skills.

The obvious glaring issue would be the depth at the center position which would have to be addressed during free agency. Connecticut’s Andre Drummond, per Draft Express, would go second-overall to Washington.

[Related: From Introvert to Accolades, the Kyrie Irving Story Adds Another Chapter]

  • David

    So we’re drafting four wing players with our four picks? Makes sense…

  • Brian

    brutal spelling of Connecticut in that last sentence.

  • BIKI024

    i take it they are assuming we’re swapping the Laker pick with the Heat?  seems to me that we should use the pick this year, by all accounts this is supposed to be a deep draft and Miami will probably have a Top 3 record again next year.. 

    my bad, i guess the point they are trying to make is that we’re getting 3 Wildcats out of the 4 picks..

  • The_Real_Shamrock

    Gilchrist is a SF as is Miller and I seriously doubt the Cavaliers draft two UK kids let alone three.  I’d gladly take Davis, Gilchrist and Lamb if the bball Gods are reading this now.  But honestly give me MKG and I’d be happy.

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com/ WFNYRick

     Indeed. Thanks Brian, fixed.

  • Joe

    If you note at the top, it says team needs have not been taken into account.

  • BisonDeleSightings

    From the top of the DraftExpress mock:

    “Team needs have NOT yet been taken into account in this mock draft”

  • mgbode

    Wizards slogan for next year if this happens:  “if you liked Kwame Brown, then you’ll love Andre Drummond”

  • http://www.waitingfornextyear.com Andrew Schnitkey

    Hahahaha, so awesome. 

  • mgbode

    ok, if the draft played out this way:

    1. MKG – pretty obvious pick.  probably some debate over Beal but I doubt anyone would be seriously upset.

    2. Fournier – I highly doubt that our FO would let Moultrie pass us by with this pick.  He has the exact type of athleticism and skills that our FO/scouting has wanted over the years as shown with the Hickson, Eyenga, TT draft picks.  Unless there were serious red flags about his work ethic.

    3. Doron Lamb – we miss on Waiters by 1 pick, now we miss on Jenkins by 1 pick.  That would be our luck, huh :)      D.Lamb is not a bad consolation prize, but he’s much more restricted on his ceiling IMO.

    4. D. Miller – I doubt we go 4 wings w/ Gee already in fold as it is.  Drafting MKG’s backup to backup MKG is funny, but I doubt we do it.   Kevin Jones is there if we want a ready-made PF.  Satoransky if we want a high-upside SG prospect (lots of work to do). 

  • BrownsFanSF

    As someone who loves the game of basketball but isn’t particularly good at it, it makes me so sad to see guys with so much talent who are just not that interested in it.

    Wall, Vesley and Drummond may take the “Team Uncoachable” crown from Boogie and ‘Reke 

  • The_Real_Shamrock

    Wizards @ 2 selecting Drummond would be almost as good, not quite, as the Cavaliers drafting #1 overall.  That is if the Cavaliers end up third.  The problem as I see it though is Washington traded McGee for Nene so why would they turnaround and use a potential top two pick on another center?  Before someone answers, yes I know, we’re talking about the Wizards.

  • The_Real_Shamrock

    I’d take Lamb if all other possibilities were exhausted and/or he was the best at who was left.  Personally I’m not high enough on the kid to warrant almost any kind of first round pick.  He needed one more year at UK IMO. Not with the needs the Cavaliers currently possess.  The second round sure why not.

  • mgbode

    exactly.

  • KevinHignett

    I agree with 100% of this. Moultrie would be a good heir apparent to Varejao and wouldn’t have to be forced right into the starting role. He already has the athleticism and quickness to defend on the perimeter and in pick & rolls, but he’d be able to take a year to build strength and learn how to defend the low post better. He’s a good fit. Eventual starting lineup: Moultrie-TT-MKG-Lamb (or Gee)-Kyrie. I like.

  • Pete

    Wall is far from uncoachable. He’s known to be a really good young man. He’s just beyond frustrated to have been playing with doofuses like Andray Blatche, Nick Young, and JaVale McGee for almost two years.

  • Harv 21

    almost as brutal as “shear (probabllity).” Calculating the odds a lamb wil get its fleece cut?

  • Harv 21

    and i misspelled will. This is why I need to just let it go when it comes to typos.

  • mgbode

    JaVale McGee magically became a coachable young possible star once removed from Washington and given to George Karl for a few months.

    Nick Young has also been at least a solid role player once removed from Washington as well.

  • Yup

    I will say for a SF MKG’s shot really concerns me. It is a mess and may never be even average. Yes, he finished as well as anyone in college basketball last season but that’s still college.

  • BrownsFanSF

    The McGee thing is downright mystifying.  Is Karl that good a coach?  Washington that bad an organization?  Did being traded light a fire under him?  Maybe a bit of all three?

    As far as Wall goes, his lack of progression from rookie to sophomore is troubling.  I don’t deny that it may have something to do with a team lacking leadership and bball IQ, but you still expect to see more improvement.  Physically there isn’t a lot that separates him from Rose or Westbrook.

  • Pete

    Nick Young is still an empty scorer taking occasionally perplexing shots in LA, just in a better situation.

    I agree about JaVale McGee — that Lakers series was very impressive, but he’s still a very inconsistent player, if you’d look overall at his body of work. I do think that George Karl will be very, very good for him, though.

    Furthermore, I think at this point it’s safe to say that Washington was a lot of square pegs in round holes held together by a couple of terrible coaches.

  • porckchopexpress

    Just my opinion but I would much rather try to teach a 19 year old with ideal size and athleticism how to shoot a basketball, than trying to teach Beal how to grow a few inches or Barnes how to agressively attack the rim.  The list of players who came out of college without a jumper includes nearly the entire original Dream Team, the list of players who came out of college too short, or unathletic and improved these areas is much less distiunguished IMO.

  • mgbode

    legitimate concern and he has to rework everything.  I think he can and he is such a stat-stuffer that he’s still worth the pick. 

    good and fair scouting report on him:
    http://nbadraftblog.com/2012-articles/may/scouting-report-michael-kidd-gilchrist.html

  • mgbode

    yeah, McGee is an enigma.  I’ve always liked Karl as a coach, so I’d love to give him credit for his progression.   But, he’s not a miracle worker.

  • mgbode

    it’s tough to say what the problem is in Washington.   players, coaches, FO giving ill-fitting parts, etc.   but, they definitely have issues.

  • Pete

    They’ve certainly brought in some knuckleheads (jury’s back out on McGee, I think), but I don’t think Wall is one of them.

    I really feel part of his trouble this past season was frustration with the lack of focus in the organization. He has GOT to iron out his jump shot, though. I would love for Wall to become a special player in this league.

  • Pete

    But I do follow you — it’s hard to pin down exactly the biggest problem with the Wizards (other than Gilbertgate a couple years ago, which really sent them into a downward spiral)

  • AlexMathews


    Team needs have NOT yet been taken into account in this mock draft.”

  • Harv 21

    Can someone explain the value of a mock draft for a team whose exact slot is not yet determined? Isn’t this another layer of conjecture laid upon the usual mock draft guesswork?

  • Guest

    Who makes more sense as a SF back up for Kidd-Gilchrist: Darius Miller for $500K or Alonzo Gee for $4 Million?

  • woofersus

    I hate it when sites do that.  If team needs haven’t been taken into account it’s not really a mock draft.  It’s just a list ranking the players coming out.

  • mgbode

    yeah, maybe the answer is simply karma.

  • mgbode

    since MKG will be locked in at a reduced rate for at least 4yrs and we know that Gee can play in the NBA, I would say “Alonzo Gee for $4mil, Alex”

  • BrownsFanSF

    Outside of our team not being in the playoffs and still being desperate to talk about basketball?  No value at all Harv :-)

  • The_Real_Shamrock

    I keep tellin’ ya Gee is a SG not a SF sheesh! ;-)

  • The_Real_Shamrock

    This is why I also liked Beal but MKG possesses so many other important traits that I could live with his funky shot.  But it definitely needs work I agree 1000%.

  • mgbode

    he might be.   but, what if we draft Jenkins and decide to use his shooting prowess as the starting SG?

  • Steve

    Whoa, whoa, whoa, slow down. Drummond is far from uncoachable. And considering Calhoun’s state this year, he probably got little to no coaching to begin with.

  • Steve

     A rank of the player’s talent/upside is useful. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of useful.

  • Vindictive_Pat

    The correct answer to this question is “Alonzo Gee”.  Gee has a season of proof under his belt and is a plus defender.  Miller has a college season on an all-star Kentucky team and I really don’t know what he’ll be like defending NBA players.  $4 million isn’t that much in relative terms.

  • porckchopexpress

    I agree on Gee, he’s a more proven commodity at an acceptable price.  You can’t put a price on rangy athletic guys who can guard either wing, and don’t have ego enough to believe they need 15-20 shots.  I also continue to beat the Doron Lamb drum.  I think if he goes to the right team he could be a great off the bench spark plug.  He’s got a great shot and ability to get to the rim, he’s just too much of a tweener to be a full time starter.

  • BrownsFanSF

    Obviously I don’t know the guy personally, but someone who seems that “disinterested” on the basketball court worries me.  Accepting coaching is in large part indicated by how hard you can be pushed.  A supremely talented player underachieving on an underachieving team doesn’t bode well for the young man.

    You make a good point about Calhoun though

  • Steve

    I don’t see the”disinterest”. I saw a team that rarely ran plays to get him the ball in good positions (the guy should be a great pick-n-roll player) and routinely chucked up jumpers. You’ve got to feed your big man, and Connecticut refused to do so.

  • mgbode

    he should be a low-block player, not a PnR guy.

    he shoots 28% from the FT line and UConn made an effort to make sure he didn’t shoot 15ft jump shots (I assume for the obvious reasons).

    you want your PnR partner to be able to hit outside shots (why Miami misses Bosh right now) and why Duncan/Garnett are so lethal.

  • BrownsFanSF

    For his sake I hope you’re right.  Either way, I think it’s safe to say the jury is still out on Drummond.